Howard Stern's transformation is based primarily on a delusional hatred of Trump

The New York Times now claims that even this new so-called “positive masculinity” of progressive men also sucks. The article was written by a feminist named Ruth Whippman. Perfect name if you ask me. I suspect that Sarah Ballcrusher was kidnapped. This is how we can forget about toxic masculinity. Now even positive masculinity is the problem. “After the cartoon supervillainy of Donald Trump and the smarmy misogyny of JD Vance, the positive masculinity of Walz and his ilk is a joyful relief. But for the next generation of boys, it might be better to abandon the masculinity rhetoric altogether.” I know.

She adds: “The idea that boys must use masculinity as a constant reference point for their own worth is harmful to them and others.” Whatever, lady. But look, what do you expect from the mindset that believes women can flaunt a 5 o'clock shadow but then ridicule women who want to be good wives and mothers? You can no longer define a woman. So what the hell do they know about men?

KAMALA HARRIS' HUSBAND DOUG EMHOFF 'HAS RESHAPE PERCEPTION OF MASILITY': MSNBC HOST

Unfortunately, the left's only real masculinity these days comes from its admirals. But look, having a liberal feminist write about masculinity is like a vegan review of The Outback Steakhouse. She will make everyone in town miserable and you can't trust her with a knife. But it's funny, after 300,000 years of functional biology, which in recent decades has included both male and female organisms, we have thoughtful experts deciding that this is all wrong. What a turnaround. It's not unlike Howard Stern.

I mean, talk about a transition. On Tuesday he did an interview with Kamala Harris that was so simple and feminine that I got my period listening to it. You should hear what keeps him up at night.

HOWARD STERN: This is what keeps me awake at night. I don't understand how my fellow Americans are doing. I don't even understand how This election is imminent. And yes, I vote for you, but I would also vote for that wall over there.

Vice President Kamala Harris appeared in a live interview on Sirius XM's “The Howard Stern Show” on Tuesday. (Getty Images)

Well, he's half right. We need a wall, you know, to keep out gang members, fentanyl dealers, human traffickers and Ana Navarro. The funny thing, however, is that Stern actually took that as a compliment. Stern has become such a fawning sycophant that he doesn't realize that if he were to vote for a wall, he's telling Kamala that he knows she's just as stupid. I mean, not to mention that Trump is the wall candidate and not Cackles McKneepads. Stern became even more pathetic and wondered why she wasn't taking a nap.

HOWARD STERN: When you say you don't take naps, I understand. Because what you have chosen to do is extremely difficult. And I mean, do you feel the pressure of the moment in the sense that when I met you out in the hallway I said: I'm really nervous because I want you to be well. I want the country to prosper.

Howard Stern says he 'hates' everyone who votes for Trump: 'They're stupid, I have no respect for them'

Hold onto. I need a minute.

Vice President Kamala Harris appeared on “The Howard Stern Show” on Tuesday. (Getty Images)

All right, we're back. Remember, Stern was always throwing nonsense at the strippers. With accuracy, I might add. Now he's worried that the would-be leader of the free world can't handle his verbal foot-stomping. I wonder if he used to be so nervous about the strippers before he spanked their bare bottoms with a dead fish. Here's Stern to anyone who dares to make a little fun of Kamala.

HOWARD STERN: Even when I saw her on Saturday Night Live with the… where Maya Rudolph plays you. I hate it. I don't want you make fun of something. I…there's too much at stake. I believe that the entire future of this country right now – I mean, as America, land of the free, home of the brave – is literally at stake.

A man who makes his living being funny is now claiming her candidacy is too important to joke about. This is a guy who once joked right after the Columbine massacre that the murderers should have raped the students before killing them. Not that I like it, Stern, but this pendulum swing from being said to be the most tasteless thing in the universe to putting it in a Tic-Tac container, you have to wonder what's going on here. It's striking that the king of the most misogynistic humor of all time becomes a breathless jerk over a progressive, hopelessly superficial candidate. But maybe that's the explanation.

This is Stern's self-imposed penance for subjecting women to demoralizing stunts, capitalizing on desperate women, and thirsting for attention even as it hits their bare asses with an oily paddle. It's true that much of Stern's transformation is based primarily on a delusional hatred of Trump, but also an unbridled hatred of himself and his past. And he has projected his disgust onto Trump, earning him praise from his Hamptons neighbors and his new pal Jimmy Kimmel, who is also repenting for his past sins.

But is Howard simply redefining masculinity? And why is it always the male left who are so desperate to get rid of masculinity altogether? It's about guilt and self-preservation. Because scratch beneath the surface of a liberal man and what do you find? A horror. Fear of his arrogant past. Pigish past. I mean, not conceited. What does priggish mean? And this fear turns them into obedient mouthpieces for a completely unqualified candidate.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

They desperately abandon logic and reason. And with it all traces of masculinity. So, Howard, you've been in therapy for 50 years? And I just diagnosed your problem in a monologue. No worries. The first visit is free.