close
close

The redistricting proposal that could change Ohio politics

The redistricting proposal that could change Ohio politics


policy

/

Student Nation


/
September 30, 2024

Ohio is considered one of the most unrest-prone states in the country, but Issue 1 could be the way to solve the problem.

The redistricting proposal that could change Ohio politics

Voters cast their ballots at the Alexander High School polling station in Albany, Ohio.

(Ty Wright/Getty)

A proposed constitutional amendment on Ohio's 2024 ballot would permanently change the way congressional districts are drawn in the state.

The proposal, titled “Issue 1,” calls for the creation of a 15-member citizen redistricting commission — made up of Democrats, Republicans and independents — to draw district maps. Current and former politicians, political party officials and lobbyists would be banned from serving on the commission, and attempts to redistrict to favor one political party or lawmaker would be unconstitutional.

“Ohioans have lived with partisan political movements for more than 80 years,” said the Rev. Terry Williams, an ordained minister and organizer with Faith Choice Ohio, a religious advocacy group that supports abortion rights. “Both parties have manipulated our state in different ways at different times, and every time you draw rigged maps, one thing always happens: our politicians are less accountable to the people they are supposed to serve.”

Members of the current Redistricting Commission are appointed by the governor, secretary of state and comptroller, along with the majority and minority leaders in the Statehouse. Of those, only two are Democrats.

In comparison, Issue 1 would require an open application process for Commission membership. A search panel of two Republican and two Democratic retired judges — each selected by legislative members of the Ohio Ballot Board — would review and select applicants.

While there is currently no poll on what Ohio voters think about Issue 1, other proposals have shown that voters in the state are more liberal when voting on ballot initiatives. For example, Baldwin Wallace University polls show that 58 percent of voters supported enshrining abortion rights in the state constitution and 57 percent supported legalizing recreational marijuana. In Ohio, only a simple majority, or just over 50 percent of voters, is required to pass amendments.

Current edition

Cover of the October 2024 issue

Ohio is considered one of the “most gerrymandered states” in the country, along with Texas, Louisiana and Arkansas. Research from the Brennan Center found that 9 million Ohioans — about 77 percent of the state's population — live in districts that lack electoral competition in electing state representative. In half of them there was no primary competition. Redistricting maps created by the Ohio Redistricting Commission have been repeatedly declared unconstitutional and rejected by the state Supreme Court.

Issue 1 was submitted to the Secretary of State's Office with over 700,000 signatures – nearly 60 percent more than needed to get on the state ballot – and received support from Citizens Not Politicians, the American Civil Liberties Union, the League of Women Voters and the labor union Organizations like AFSCME and SEIU.

Reverend Williams specifically highlighted anti-abortion measures as an example of Ohio political leaders' disregard for voters. “At Faith Choice Ohio, we know that Ohioans do not support abortion bans, unnecessary restrictions on abortion providers, and laws that make life more difficult for those seeking abortions.” If Issue 1 is approved, the pastor and his colleagues hope “for an Ohio where “Lawmakers stop harassing abortion seekers and start supporting them,” he said. “We believe fairness is important and gerrymandering is unholy.”

The Ohio GOP, which controls the statehouse, state Supreme Court and governor's office, opposes the change. In March, the press secretary for the Ohio Senate Majority Caucus called it an “overly complex, hair-brained and radical plan” that would “establish a citizens' commission to replace your elected representative.” Gov. Mike DeWine claimed the proposal would actually make gerrymandering worse. “If this amendment were passed, Ohio would actually have a system that requires — that forces — mapmakers to draw districts using group gerrymandering.”

The proposed Issue 1 ballot — drafted by Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose and approved by the Ohio Ballot Board — outraged citizens, not politicians, arguing that the wording portrayed the amendment in a negative light. According to this language, the amendment would “create an appointed redistricting commission that is not elected by the state's voters or cannot be removed by them,” “removes the constitutional protections against gerrymandering approved by nearly three-quarters of Ohio voters,” and “establish a new, taxpayer-funded commission of appointees to determine the boundaries of the state’s legislative and congressional districts.”

“The language was, in my opinion, the argument for why you shouldn’t vote for it,” said Democratic Sen. Paula Hicks-Hudson, a member of the Ohio Board of Elections The nation. “The language did not meet constitutional standards.” Hicks-Hudson and fellow House Democratic leader Terrence Upchurch voted against the language and ultimately filed a brief with the Ohio Supreme Court waiving it. “We received the language the day of the meeting,” Senator Hicks-Hudson said, adding that there was “no give and take” between her, Upchurch and the majority-Republican board members. “The Board of Elections is just a victim of gerrymandering in the state of Ohio.”

Despite these concerns, the Ohio Supreme Court approved the language with only minor changes. “I don't agree with her decision,” said Senator Hicks-Hudson, but she ultimately hopes “that the people who believe that citizens rather than politicians are a good thing for this state will go out and educate themselves and others about it.” “the value of a new way of drawing these maps.”

As Republicans pass bills restricting abortion and gender-affirming care, many in Ohio see Issue 1 as the only way to combat the state's increasing turn to extremism. “The extreme politics being brought to the statehouse is a direct result of gerrymandering,” said CJ Wilson, a 22-year-old regional organizer with Common Cause Ohio. “When you are no longer afraid of losing the election, you can do whatever you want.”

Wilson also discussed gerrymandering in places like New York and other liberal states and considered the practice generally inappropriate. “It disenfranchises voters, particularly minority voters,” Wilson said, calling it a nationwide problem. “This is a bipartisan problem, depending on the state, and this is a bipartisan solution,” Wilson told Issue 1. “This is the only sure way to keep the politicians under control.”

“I was very young when this happened, but Ohio used to be a swing state,” Wilson said. “It's one of the reddest these days.” For Wilson, voting for Issue 1 is a great chance to make your voice heard in 2024 and beyond. “Even if you don’t want to vote for a single politician,” Wilson said. “The time to get out and vote is now.”

Can we count on you?

The coming elections are about the fate of our democracy and basic civil rights. The conservative architects of Project 2025 plan to institutionalize Donald Trump's authoritarian vision at all levels of government if he wins.

We have already experienced events that fill us with both terror and cautious optimism – in all of this, The nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and a champion of bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers sat down for interviews with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders, explained JD Vance's superficial right-wing populist appeals, and discussed the path to a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like this and the one you just read are critically important at this critical juncture in our country's history. Now more than ever, we need independent journalism with clear-eyed, in-depth reporting that understands the headlines and separates fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and elevating the voices of grassroots activists.

As we move into 2024 and what is likely to be the most crucial election of our lifetime, we need your support to continue producing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you very much,
The editors of The nation

Zurie Pope

Zurie Pope is a sophomore at the University of Cincinnati pursuing a bachelor's degree in journalism. His work has appeared in Youth Journalism International, Unpublished magazineAnd The News Recordthe University of Cincinnati student newspaper.

More from The nation

Jordan Peterson (left) and Russell Brand speak during the Rescue the Republic rally on September 29, 2024 in Washington, DC.

A coalition that was supposed to unite the political fringe against the establishment was a disgusting idiot.

Amanda Moore

Kamala Harris speaks to a crowd during a campaign rally at James B. Dudley High School in Greensboro, North Carolina.

More than 4.4 million Americans are currently 18 years old — many of them in high school — but their value as a voting bloc is grossly underrepresented.

Student Nation

/

Jelinda Montes

Republican vice presidential candidate Senator JD Vance participates in a debate at the CBS Broadcast Center on October 1, 2024 in New York City.

In the vice presidential debate, JD Vance was every bit the brilliant Yale Law graduate, but his canned bromide proved bad in the end.

Chris Lehmann

JD Vance and Tim Walz during the first and likely only vice presidential debate of 2024 on October 1, 2024 in New York City.

JD Vance is a skilled liar, but the vice presidential debate produced enough bad clips to hurt Trump's campaign.

Jeet Heer

Republican vice presidential candidate Senator JD Vance and Minnesota Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Walz participate in a debate at the CBS Broadcast Center on October 1, 2024 in New York City.

In a debate where JD Vance lied and lied and lied, Tim Walz did double duty. Walz not only had to present his own arguments, but also defend the truth.

John Nichols


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *